
One thing we do as Illinois workers’ compensation attorneys is constantly read case law on newer cases. Every month there are new decisions at the Illinois Appellate Court. Sometimes these decisions change what the law is, or at least how it is interpreted. Other times these cases provide a road map on how similar cases should be decided in the future.
I do not always agree with these decisions, but most of them make sense. That is certainly the situation on a case that was decided this year for an injured worker who was hurt in August of 2023.
Side note. A lot of Illinois work comp attorneys lie to their clients and claim that if you go to trial it will take forever. I often hear that some attorneys tell injured workers that just going to trial will take 2-3 years. In this case, the worker got hurt, went to trial, won within a few months of getting hurt and the appeal was decided a few months after that. There were two more appeals which is why the case was not finally resolved until this year, but a normal trial does not take very long to happen if your attorney fights for you.
Here is a summary of the case:
Jose Avila was working as a delivery driver for I Deliver Logistics, delivering Amazon packages. While driving in Aurora, another driver cut him off. Avila honked and made gestures. The other driver got out of his SUV, approached Avila’s truck, and punched him. A short scuffle followed.
Avila got back in his truck and drove a few blocks away to make his next delivery. About four minutes later, the same men followed him, jumped him from behind while he was delivering a package, badly beat him, and stole his chain. He suffered facial injuries, broken teeth, a broken nose, headaches, and PTSD. He needed medical treatment and was taken off work.
An arbitrator awarded him workers’ compensation benefits, finding the attack was a “street risk” of his job as a traveling employee. The employer appealed, and the Workers’ Compensation Commission reversed, saying Avila was the aggressor and caused the fight.
The circuit court disagreed and reinstated benefits. The Appellate Court agreed with the circuit court.Even if Avila acted angrily at first, the video showed the other driver threw the first punch. More importantly, the second beating happened minutes later, after Avila had driven away and returned to work. The attackers chose to follow and assault him again, which broke any connection to the earlier argument.
The court reinstated his benefits and sent the case back to the Commission to decide whether penalties and attorney’s fees should be awarded against the employer. Eventually this case settled because the insurance company had no other choice.
My Thoughts On This Case
This is clearly the right decision. It can be expected that if you drive around for your job, you will encounter other drivers. Some of these drivers will be assholes or criminals.
These crazy drivers attacked him. He was injured. The argument against him was that he started it by making gestures. That is nonsense. The attack happened after he left the scene and these people chased him down. They clearly were the aggressors.
What is nuts about this case to me is that aside from it being so clearly a compensable case, his injuries were not that big. They likely spent almost as much on fighting the case as they paid for the settlement. They probably thought that an attorney would not spend time fighting a case like this and fortunately they were wrong.
The key point is that you need to have an attorney in your corner who is both aggressive and willing to go to trial. The attorney could have given up after the original decision was reversed, but they kept fighting because they knew their client was in the right.








